Not a bad question, I think. I was screaming at that BASTARD Paulson tonight. Or at his image on the televisual apparatus. As he lied to Congress. Saying that the decree in the 2.5 pages of plans on how to solve our financial clusterfuck (which a White House spokes-dick said today was months in the preparing!) about how all decisions will be "non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency" was simple politeness.
Yeah. He was just being polite. Of course he knows Congress will want oversight. But by declaring that they can't have any, he was being polite. To them. Get it? Surely, you must. It makes perfect sense. Right? RIGHT? PLEASE TELL ME THAT IT MAKES SENSE!
Is it okay for an atheist to take the Lord Our God's name in vain? I'd sure like to right now if I can. I even swore with real swear words above here. I try not to do that. That's for the comments section.
Is this the October Surprise all us lefty liberal no-good do-nothin' jerks have been waiting for? I mean, they let slip that this less than three page solution to the greatest financial meltdown of decades was MONTHS in the making. And the best they could come up with was "Trust us - we know what we're doing. Go look at shiny things now."
What has happened to this country? Where are we going? What are we going to do?
Now playing: For Against - Get On With It